I am a confirmed believer in local government. Taking decisions as close as possible to the people involved makes good sense and we are in my view an overly centralised country. But I can’t get enthusiastic about the current anaemic form of local government that we have. I say that having served as a councillor in Coventry for eight years and having from time to time tried to persuade Labour unsuccessfully, while in power, to reform and re-empower local government.

Mayors can make a huge difference. Visibility brings accountability but also the ability to lead. The current system provides fragmented political leadership that is often unable to control the local bureaucracy and force change. It is largely anonymous to the wider electorate and therefore unaccountable. Good councils are removed from power and bad councils survive because the electorate vote overwhelmingly on national issues and allegiances at local elections.

Local government therefore has insufficient standing or respect and as a result has not been given the power required to genuinely make a difference by either Tory or Labour governments. A majority of people in Coventry, as elsewhere, have no idea who the council’s leader is or what the council does and does not do. This is not the fault of the many good and dedicated people serving as councillors, it is the structure that the population fail to engage with.

If all is well and our cities perform as well as they can, and our councils are as effective and responsive as they need to be we can leave this unchanged but we all know that is not the case.

Mayors can do five things:

Give real leadership: Government is not just about the things you do directly it’s about the influence you have harnessing others energy resources and agenda. Presently the leader of the council can seek to engage and the chief executive can make a good speech but they don’t have sufficient weight to fully capture attention and harness a city’s energy for the collective good.

Change the balance of power within a council: The more streamlined political leadership would be better able to impose itself on the bureaucracy, force change and improve responsiveness. Inertia is a most powerful force in local government as elsewhere.

Improve accountability: As London has shown people have views and vote for or against the mayor. They develop opinions of him or her they therefore inevitably take more interest in local affairs.

Cost less: the combined cost of the chief executive’s salary, leaders’ allowances and the cost of their respective offices is considerable and can be much reduced.

Benefit our national politics: Visible and therefore influential mayors of Midland and northern cities would speak loudly, from the regions and impact positively on our currently London-centric politics.

And specific to Coventry: a mayor could keep us in the first division of influence. Leicester has adopted the mayoral model, Birmingham may do so. If we do not we will, relatively lose out in influence and relevance.

—————————————————————————————

Bob Ainsworth is MP for Coventry North-East and former secretary of state for defence

—————————————————————————————

Photo: Amanda Slater