A new book by Tory MPs elected last year exposes a yearning for a more authentically Conservative agenda

It must be hard for new Conservative MPs. After years of loyalty to David Cameron, even with the strong tailwinds of 2010 he could not secure their birthright: victory at a general election. As these new-intake MPs point out at the start of their new book, After the Coalition, he might be a Conservative prime minister, but he does not lead a Conservative government. So this book is a natural response. It is a defence of the Conservative ideal: free markets; personal responsibility; anti-state, anti-trade union individualism.

Their narrative recalls Margaret Thatcher. They pooh-pooh socialism. They attack so-called statism in favour of individualism and just deserts. The BBC and union barons get a bashing. But I think even for some of their Tory colleagues their analysis will go too far. Britain is ‘work-shy’ and they describe the ‘unqualified success’ of privatisation with little mention of the energy and rail fare inflation hurting all of our constituents.

The detail of their analysis is interesting, though. On the economy they are quick to ‘prove’ that overspending between 2001 and 2007 caused current budget deficits, not global events in 2008-9. But their answer is complimentary to Labour: they wish to keep our golden rule – to balance the budget over the economic cycle – and extend it by asking the Office for Budget Responsibility to adjudicate on whether the government has achieved it.  Their support for rules-based economic policy is a continuation of New Labour ideas, even if this goes unacknowledged.

High pay in the private and public sector is rightly acknowledged as ‘artificially distorted’. As they say, rent-seeking behaviour must end. But the public’s everyday concerns – pay, prices and jobs – barely figure. Given greater emphasis is the importance of reducing ‘idleness’ and the benefits bill. Their answer – conditionality and time-limited benefits, with more personal insurance – may appear initially attractive, but shifting the cost of unemployment from state to individual while pay packets shrink will be a hard sell. Most people hate freeloading, but it is surprising there is little here on tackling inflation, low growth and poor demand.

Similarly, an overly simplistic analysis fails to treat care work differently from manufacturing or business processing, while education policy is largely a restoration of elitism. In an uncertain world, the answer these Conservatives give is more risk and uncertainty to the individual. But the fact is that, with falling living standards and a tough labour market, ‘take your chances’ rhetoric is not what voters are looking for.

There is a hint for progressives in all this. Conservatives still resentful of the coalition want to show their true-blue colours, but each step they take to prove themselves redblooded Thatcherites is a pace away from where the public are. Our job is to demonstrate we understand the public’s worries. We know that times are hard, but in government again we will take concrete steps to better their lot. Let’s capitalise on these Conservatives’ mistakes, and show them for the backward-looking ideologues they are.

—————————————————————————————

Alison McGovern
is MP for Wirral South. After the Coalition: A Conservative Agenda for Britain is written by Kwasi Kwarteng, Priti Patel, Dominic Raab, Chris Skidmore and Liz Truss

—————————————————————————————

Photo: Miki Yamanouchi