Who won?

There’s an episode of the West Wing where they are trying to work out how CJ (the president’s spokesperson) should deal with questions about worrying economic figures – she’s worried the administration will look like it hasn’t noticed the indicators. They don’t want to use the word recession in the White House so their code is ‘bagel’. It’s a blunt script device to make a point about out-of-touch politicians.

David Cameron might as well have told Ed about his favourite bagel fillings in the early exchanges at PMQs today.

By concentrating on the economy and particularly the job prospects – or lack of them – for women and young people Ed was speaking beyond the chamber to the concerns of the country. And in the initial exchanges when Cameron tried to claim the government was doing everything it could to help growth it just sounded hollow. People, real people, outside the Westminster bubble are worried, even where they are still in work. And Cameron sounded like he hasn’t noticed.

There is one continuing worry for me which was displayed in the later exchanges with Ed today. The Conservatives have very effectively cemented the idea that Labour’s plan would be to ‘borrow our way out of the crisis’. It’s not true, of course; we’d cut the deficit more slowly to allow us the flexibility to do things like reduce VAT to put more money in people’s pockets. But the rehearsal and fashioning of the message is successful and I think we still need to up our game on challenging this.

But Ed won. And if we can keep the narrative on the poor economic performance, a turn from an economy that was in recovery by the time of last year’s election, the government will be blamed.

Best question

Steve Rotheram securing a commitment to the Hillsborough debate. I’m not properly up on the finer minutiae of what parliamentary shenanigans happened last night to threaten the debate. But it’s over 22 years since 96 people were killed because of what essentially boiled down to poor management of a football match. The families still don’t know fully what happened or who’s responsible. They deserve this debate and they deserve the truth. Dogged MPs like Steve Rotheram will get there in the end, I’m sure of it.

Backbench watch

Two Alans – one Beith (Con), one Reed (Lib Dem) asked the same question on equalising the pension age and the awful impact on women who are nearing retirement age, who will lose out significantly – something that Labour has been campaigning on for months.

Cameron is obviously gearing up for an announcement about something that will soften the blow for women affected and that’s the commitment he made today. Twice.

Clearly the coalition parties are both so desperate to be able to claim credit on whatever the announcement turns out to be that they couldn’t agree who should ask the question on it. Expect campaign material and interview answers from both parties claiming the credit for whatever is announced in the coming weeks. And they’ll be able to say ‘look we got the commitment at PMQs’. Don’t be fooled though: if this policy is changed it will be because of an effective campaign from Labour and pensions and women’s groups. Not because two coalition backbenchers couldn’t agree who should ask a question at PMQs.
 
—————————————————————————————

Sarah Hayward is a Labour councillor in Camden