On the last day of party conference I took part in a discussion with Caroline Flint on Standing As A Councillor. One of the questions put forward was related to the local government settlement. My response was short and sweet – this government does not understand the needs of our communities. The question is how can Labour-run authorities respond that will set the stage for a Labour mayor and a Labour government?

There’s no doubt that the aim of the Tories is to reduce the role of local government within our communities. Yet London boroughs in particular are expected to continue to meet the growing pressures on providing enough school places as well as building enough adequate housing, despite support for social housing being cut by more than 60 per cent.

Weekly bin collections are important to me, but I hear nothing from the government that will help us to deal with the massive inequity in our city. Although London has more high-income households than any other region in England, it also contains the largest proportion of low-income households. Twenty-eight per cent of the capital’s neighbourhoods are in the most deprived 20 per cent in the country.

Faced with such deep cuts I am happy to see that no Labour councils have been seduced by the extreme left position of setting an illegal budget by refusing to make any cuts. That position damaged Labour during the 1980s as Labour-run councils were branded as ‘Looney Left’ and helped make the party unelectable during that period. However, I do understand councillors now calling for a cut in top senior managers, even though this is more symbolic than actually making any significant dent in the millions that we have to cut.

During this time I believe that it’s important that Labour authorities are able to show what they stand for. Prevention work is often not a statutory service that councils must provide (for example early family prevention work) and these may be put forward by local government officers as the most obvious options. I fear that cutting prevention services will cost us not only in financial terms years down the line but in social terms as well. ‘Dealing with the root cause’ has been a line spun out by all parties – now Labour can show that we are committed to our communities.

Shared services and more joined-up working is something that elected members need to push forward. Boroughs can become extremely territorial. However, some councils have worked well together, for example the west London alliance of Hammersmith & Fulham, Kensington & Chelsea and the City of Westminster, reaping not only the financial benefits of working together but are now a political  force for the Tories. Labour boroughs in the east should think about a closer partnership. 

I ask myself how vocal has Boris Johnson has been in his duty to stand up for London. Local authorities have been put in the position where they are having to choose between library services, tackling anti-social behaviour, transport for the vulnerable, or housing provision, to name but a few. While Johnson talks of cutting bureaucracy and local government waste, the long-term effects of the government’s policies continue to impact on the development of communities.

I hope that Labour councils will take a strategic long-term approach to the cuts, by ringfencing key services. While our priorities will be different in every borough, it would send a strong political message if our response was somehow coordinated. Most councils have been doing cuts ‘across the board’, but what makes having a Labour-run council different? In these dark days with a weak mayor and a government that does not care, Labour councils are lights of hope in London.

—————————————————————————————

Josie Channer is Labour’s London assembly candidate for Bexley and Bromley

—————————————————————————————

Photo: Juan Salmoral