Labour should embrace the positive English patriotism that exists in the country

By Mark Rusling

—The late David Cairns devised the ‘conservatory principle’, which stated that an MP should only become Labour leader if they understand the desire to own a conservatory. Spot on. I would add the ‘England shirt principle’ – a Labour leader should be happy with someone wearing an England football shirt and voting Labour.

This goes to two issues that cause many in England to feel uneasy about Labour. We have an England problem. We are happy to celebrate Burns Night or St Patrick’s Day, but not St George’s Day. This is not to pander to racism or nationalism (English or Scottish). It is simply saying that our tone, policies and, occasionally, our leaders do not tap into a sense of Englishness in the same way as some Tory policies seem to do effortlessly. Free schools and fundholding GPs evoke folk myths of the village school and doctor who everybody knows. We might scoff at the myths, and they might well be false, but they speak to an Englishness that George Orwell would have recognised, and that much of the country understand.

This is not to legitimise John Major’s cant of old maids cycling to Holy Communion, which does not speak for England now, if it ever did. But we should not therefore assume that there are no English myths, traditions and values that people want to believe in. We should too. And we should be happy for people who wish to express those myths by wearing an England shirt. Just as many a decent religion is defamed by its violent followers, so we should not allow the English Defence League-marching, British National party-voting fringe to blind Labour to an important part of our national story.

Labour has always succeeded when we combine social justice with positive, value-driven patriotism. Clement Attlee did not win his 1945 landslide only because of the NHS and the welfare state – he won because, from the mid-1930s, Labour and not the National Conservatives expressed the widely felt need to stand up to fascism. We should never ignore the terrible underbelly of patriotism. We can compromise with the electorate, but not with the EDL. But we should not sneer at positive patriotism.

When we do so, it feeds into a sense of Labour as a metropolitan party – fine for the big cities, but out of touch with everyone else. A look at the map of English Labour seats tells you that. This is our second problem. It explains why, in the leadership election, Andy Burnham did so well in the north-west and Ed Balls drew support in Yorkshire. Both appeared to challenge the metropolitan consensus. This is not a north versus south argument; it is a metropolitanism versus the rest argument.

We have to get to grips with England, patriotism and the sense of Labour as a purely metropolitan party. We have to show that we understand the desire to own a conservatory  and to wear an England shirt (often the same people – go to the suburbs). We have to do this, not just to gather votes, but because we want to; not just because we understand our voters – all of them – but because we are them.

Mark Rusling is a councillor in the London borough of Waltham Forest and owns an England shirt