The Right Hon Lord Adonis

The Right Hon David Cameron MP
Prime Minister
10 Downing Street, SW1                                                                26 July 2012

APPRENTICESHIPS IN WHITEHALL

I wonder if you might consider a suggestion to set up, as a matter of urgency, a pan-Whitehall “government administration” apprenticeship scheme  for 16 and 18 year-old school leavers?

I set out the arguments, and a proposal, for such a scheme in an article in the FT on July 14th, which I attach.

I suggest that at least 500 such apprentices should be recruited each year in a single Whitehall scheme, mirroring the prestigious graduate fast stream which also recruits about 500 (mostly young) graduates a year.

An apprenticeship scheme on these lines would be highly positive in its own right.  It would train a cadre of young people in administrative tasks essential to effective government, complementing the existing recruitment of graduates.

However, there is a wider and very important purpose to this proposal.  The government has got to start practising what it preaches.  We cannot tell private sector employers that they should be recruiting apprentices systematically, in the face of high youth unemployment and an acute national skills shortage, when Whitehall itself does not do so.  Indeed, there are hardly any staff under the age of 21 employed within central government departments, whether apprentices or not, mirroring a national situation which also needs to change radically.

This is not a partisan point.  As I acknowledge in my FT article, the Department for Transport, for which I was responsible before the election, has no apprentices.  It is a process of reflection on the causes of youth unemployment which has led me to appreciate why this needs to change and why the government needs to lead by example – and not in a grudging or half-hearted manner but boldly.

Just to provide a few more facts.  PQ answers to me show that as at June 1st most Whitehall departments employed no apprentices whatever (excluding agencies and NDPBs).  Those with no apprentices include the Home Office, the Foreign Office, the Department of Health, CLG, DWP, DCMS, DfT and DfID.  Among the rest, the number of apprentices employed is tiny in almost all cases (1 in MOJ, 2 in DECC, 3 in DEFRA, 5 in the Treasury, 14 in the Cabinet Office, 19 in BIS).

So the challenge is clearly one of starting from scratch, to create a proper apprenticeship scheme in Whitehall, rather than scaling up current grossly inadequate initiatives.

I would be very happy to discuss this further.

With best wishes,

ANDREW ADONIS