Among the acres of newsprint devoted to plans to charge foreigners to use the NHS one suggestion is especially troubling: a proposal to deny foreign women access to free abortions.
This isn’t going to be about the rights and wrongs of charging for the NHS – although while I have the platform I’ll say the idea repulses me – it’s about what the production of this report tells us about the Tory-led government.
This is about a government whose members don’t acknowledge women in their policymaking and who are unable to feel an empathy with those whose lives and experiences are alien to them. And in a government dominated by wealthy men it’s no surprise that the needs and rights of women, especially poor women, don’t even cross their radar.
The Department of Health consultation would have us believe that this is about saving money. However, its own report acknowledges it has no figures for the cost of women travelling to the UK for abortions.
But that’s not to say money isn’t important here; in fact it’s the crux of the argument.
Implicit in this report is the belief that women are jetting into the UK to take advantage of the NHS, but this idea rests on the lie that for women abortion is somehow easily accessible. In countries such as Poland and Spain where abortion access is restricted the choice is between pulling together money to travel to the UK or pulling it together for a dangerous backstreet abortion.
Because, despite what anti-choice advocates would have you believe, when abortion is banned it doesn’t stop, it just becomes more dangerous.
Any children born due to this measure will more often than not be born into poverty because this, like all attempts to restrict access to abortion worldwide, is one that has the harsher impact on working-class women.
Social conservatism is the bedfellow of economic conservatism for a reason: those with money will always be able to bypass the law and, in this case, wealthier women will simply have a larger bill, while working-class women risk injury or death just to exercise the most basic control over their own body.
This government that tells us it wants to cut red tape and promote personal freedom would dictate to women when they have a child, tell rape victims they must have their rapist’s child, tell mothers that their family will be cast into poverty by having a child they can’t afford to care for.
The Tories might tell us what other countries do is none of their concern, but if they take this action they will be as guilty of snatching away women’s rights as their fellow conservatives who have legislated against them.
This isn’t an argument about what the NHS does or doesn’t do, it’s an argument about our government’s thoughtless approach to policymaking, an approach that further marginalises women. And it’s an argument we have to fight and win.
———————————————————
Estelle Hart is a Labour party member in Gower constituency Labour party. She tweets @EstelleHart
———————————————————
Suspect this is about Irish women, who can’t have an abortion in their own country but
are allowed (Irish High Court judgement) to travel to Britain to have an
abortion. Then again, Irish women are EU and Commonwealth citizens, does the
consultation define “foreign women” as non-EU/Commonwealth citizens?
PS How about Ireland giving its citizens access to contraception and safe abortions.
Jesus, can you please READ the consultation document, this is about “non-EEA migrants”. Poland, Spain (and Ireland) are part of the European Economic Area. Seriously, the Conservatives may be nasty, but Labour party members are clearly degenerates (unable to read a consultation document and trying to get a cheap headline out of a serious issues such as abortion).
In reponse to the comments that this change won’t impact on EU citizens it will as the EHIC scheme only applies to certain services and if abortion isn’t deliberately classed as a non emergency procedure it will be covered.
Also to get a headline about Tory misogyny you don’t have to make things up…
It is unfortunate that the phrase ‘dominated by wealthy men’ is used as it is a blanket term implying all of the same ‘species’ would act in the same way. There are many women too of a certain social, cultural, religious & political persuasion who would back this proposal.This is the problem of couching issues in purely gender terms as other equally important determinants are ignored. I would like to see a day when Labour begins to push forward a post-gender perspective, and we look at ‘people’ & all of the social and other factors that influence society and policy responses. The younger generation in particular are moving away from black n white gender stereo-typing & perceptions.
Most people would probably agree that a foreign national in distress should receive services but those simply seeking to access free services without paying in should be stopped, especially when this may delay treatment for UK nationals. But I agree, we need data and research on this before defining it as a policy problem!