Police forces across the country work hard, delivering community safety and working with residents to problem solve and cut crime
Policing can only be based on partnership. ‘The police are the public and the public are the police’ is the most quoted of the Peelian principles, set out by the founder of the Metropolitan police. Few people, police, members of the public or politician would ever dispute it – except, perhaps, London mayor, Boris Johnson.
Despite the opposition of 20 of the 25 London assembly, and without the approval of the Home Office, Johnson has decided to spend up to £400,000 of public money on heavy weaponry, which cannot be targeted but only used against people at large, namely water cannon.
This is not just a decision for London – it is the first time that water cannon will feature in policing in all of England and Wales. There is no consensus for this step. Johnson shows little respect for his public in following the example of police commissioner, Bernard Hogan-Howe, who has said that ‘his’ officers are there to wage ‘total war on crime’. Londoners may be unhappy with the notion that cops are their leaders’ storm troopers rather than servants of the public. Made sceptical, through scandals such as the Lawrence case,‘plebgate’ and the deaths of Ian Tomlinson, Mark Duggan and John Charles de Menezes, Londoners may worry too about further arming the police and might ask exactly who will be defining the enemy.
Labour assembly member Joanne McCartney objects that ‘there is confusion behind exactly how the process of their deployment will work’. Police and crime commissioners across both the country and the political spectrum are against their introduction. The Association of Chief Police Officers’ briefing says that ‘water cannon are capable of causing serious injury or even death’. The home secretary is right when she states that we need to consider the health and safety aspects before going any further. There are examples from across Europe of severe injuries caused by police using water cannon. The riots in London in 2010 could not have been stopped with these devices which only work in spaces the size of Parliament Square.
We are a country of free speech. We do not police protests through water cannon but through respect for that right and the rights of others who disagree. There were no riots where I live in Northumbria. If police there make a mistake, even a grave one, they do not retreat into defensive obfuscation but trust their public with the truth. Lost confidence which gives rise to protest and then, as respect for the rule of law evaporates, to lawlessness, is better not triggered in the first place. It will not be recovered by indiscriminate blasting of protesters, bystanders and criminals alike with thousands of kilos of water.
Since 2010, through massive spending cuts imposed by the mayor’s Conservative party, the people of London have lost 3,111 police officers. Water cannon are not a substitute for uniformed officers on the street. Nor are they a substitute for the trust of the community in their police, so lamentably weakened under Johnson’s bravado but feeble stewardship.
———————————
Vera Baird QC is police and crime commissioner for Northumbria. She tweets @northumbriapcc
———————————
How sad that anyone can confuse freedom of speech with freedom to burn, loot, assault and destroy.
although Ian tomlinson being assaulted and the officer who did this ,only punishment was to be sacked, accepting that the jury in full information of the facts that 3 different autopsies ,gave different reasons for death, then the jury felt that they couldn’t find him guilty of manslaughter, Jean Charles Demenez terrible death was a mixture of confusing him with a terrorist who had tried to kill, days after 52 people had been killed and the fact that Commisioner Ian Blair had been wrongly informed that JCM had jumped the barrier only added to the mistakes, Plebgate hasn’t been proved that Andrew Mitchell didn’t call PC Rowlands a pleb, regarding Stehpen Lawrence that was 21 years ago, after the initital inquiry, the family weren’t shwon enough repsect, that’s soemthing various laobutr people have done through out the years when otehrs have been Killed From Taxi driver David Wilkie in the miners strike to those who died in the troubles, there were various things wrong with the Mcpherson inquiry into the death Of Lawrence, including IMO, the abolition of double jeopardy, the press naming 3 innocent men, and the hearsay evidence they were eventually found guilty on,let alone people xploiting the Mcpherson report and anti white racism going up as a result of it,
for the record, the cuts to police mean that Hogans howe’s claim to have war on crime is empty rhetoric ,as for policing by consent, what does that mean, most people want the return of the death penalty, but most politicians correctly don’t. the fact is that the majority of the public want ,a police service to tackle crime and beign given the tools to do it, we have several laws under the human rights that mean detention or self defence must be proportionate, Yes the 2011 riots water cannons wouldn’t have been appropriate, but as we are one of only 3 police Services in the world where all officers aren’t armed, and New Zealand and Ireland don’t have their equivalant of Moss side or Stonebridge, then giving police equipment that’s relevant to be used in the right circumstances is not only right is appropraite for self defence,
What’s the problem with the police ,regarding the death of Mark Duggan, a recent judge investigation, found that there “may” be mistrust into police notes if police talk to each other while making them, and the IPCC, not the he police wrongly said that there was a shoot out,and based on that some papers said duggan had fired, until a day later the police claimed “they’d never said duggan fired”‘ but Duggan was lawfully killed, he had a gun in the cab he was in,when he was stopped, first rate inteligence,had lead to him being stopped as he’d been filmed buying it ,an hour earlier,with the intention. To go shoot someone dead, what’s Ms a airs on about, that was a police sucsess.