I am an absurdly unsuccessful politico. In almost two decades of political involvement, my highest elected office was two years as a council backbencher, a stint condemned to total irrelevance by my voting to depose the Labour council leader in my first meeting. I was immediately assigned to be the lowest ranking member of the street cleaning scrutiny committee, and it has been downhill from there.
My unmitigated personal electoral failure has had one advantage. Having eventually accepted my own total unsuitability for elected office (too much hard work, weekends spent in church halls, looking sympathetic, doing Vodka shots at Baja Beach club in Newcastle seen as career limiting), I observe real politicians with a sympathetic eye.
However bad they are, I would be far, far, worse.
So it is with some humility that I present a series of political rules designed to make life a little easier for aspirant politicians.
1. Don’t base your electoral strategy on asking voters ‘would you like a pony?’
We hear a lot of how the electorate favour tax cuts, more spending on the NHS, nationalised trains and lower fuel taxes. Indeed, the electorate would probably like each of these things. We would all like a pony, after all.
However, the electorate are not thick and know that if they want a pony, there will be a hay bill.
Asking voters if they would like a series of ponies, and then triumphantly declaring that this proves the electorate desire a whole field full of ponies will lead you into a political dead end.
Worse, when the electorate reject your ponies on cost grounds, you will be tempted to say: ‘but you like ponies, you said so! Have some more ponies!’ – which leads you to force an ever-expanding number of ponies on the electorate, who will respond: ‘Oh no, we’ll all die in ponygeddon’. Don’t do it.
2. Don’t do the left-right-left shuffle
What is the left-right left shuffle? It is where you have a nice leftwing policy, but you know the electorate appear to want a nasty rightwing thing, so you present your policy as being really right wing, when it isn’t really. You then end up explaining to your own people, who are horrified, that it’s leftwing, really. You go left-right-left in an undignified shuffle.
The left-right-left shuffle is popular amongst political thinkers and advisers smart enough to know that you need to sell things to sceptical voters, but who are reluctant to accept that this means the voters want them to do things that aren’t lovely.
Don’t fall for it. If you want to do something, do it on its own merits, whatever they are. If you don’t want to do what the voters want, don’t pretend you do with a little rhetorical shuffle. It won’t work and you’ll probably fall over.
3. Don’t make absolutely everything about values
Politics matters. It really does. It changes lives.
But the temptation to make relatively small things symbolic of something huge should be resisted, especially when this involves asserting superior moral values: Abjure the temptation to make the taper rate of tax credits a story of moral failure and utter callousness on one hand, and redeeming social justice on the other.
For one thing, no one will really believe it. Are you really so pure? For another thing, are you totally sure that you will never need to alter the taper rate, under any circumstances?
It’s perfectly possible to object to a policy without asserting moral superiority as the basis for your objection. Indeed, it can even be more convincing.
4. Don’t embiggen everything and don’t fear modesty
Politics is about change, right? If change is good, bigger change must be better. So whatever your policy, it must be presented as being hugely significant? Right?
Wrong. Helping small businesses get better help with hiring people is a worthy thing. It doesn’t need the burden of demonstrating why a ‘one nation long-term economic plan for alarm clock Britain’s hard workers who play by the rules’ is what we need.
Political modesty is not a cardinal sin. Look around you, at your fellow politicians. Pick any one. Hand on heart, would you really want them let loose, utterly unrestrained, putting all their most radical dreams into practice? No? Worry they’d make a total mess of it?
Then remember: that’s you, to everyone else. So it isn’t always the right thing to make everything you’d do sound revolutionary. Sometimes small is good. Sometimes, knowing your limits is a very good idea. I learned this after the seventh vodka shot in Baja Beach club.
5. If you’re tempted to tell a journalist you want to punch them in the throat, don’t.
Well, sometimes you have to state the obvious, right?
———————————
Hopi Sen is a Labour blogger who writes here, is a contributing editor to Progress, and writes a fortnightly column for ProgressOnline here
———————————
Photo: Eva the Weaver
Nice one Hopi
Where there’s political life, there’s Hopi. Such wisdom.
I’ve been in an around politics and the media at all levels for 40 years now. If I have learnt one thing, its that politicians are the most misunderstood people there are. They (well ‘we’, I’m currently a local councillor), and this is a matter of public disbelief, frequently eschew claiming all our allowances – while my erstwhile fellow hacks and I claimed to the limit. As the psychologist Daniel Kahneman points out, politicians are different from most people as we are all disproportionately happy to pursue risk. Hopi’s vote against his Leader could just as easily have been the first step on a glowing political career. Politicians (all of us, UKIP, Greens, Tories, Nats) are usually there because we want to do things we believe. The electorate are sophisticated in their perception of flim-flam. They simply want honesty and authenticity. As Hopi says, “If you want to do something, do it on its own merits, whatever they are.” And tell people honestly why you are doing it. You may have no career or you may end up Party Leader – but this will be largely dictated by being in the right place at the right time, not by a misleading convoluted ‘sales chat’ of why you did what you did. You should be a contributing editor, Hopi, oops, you are
Try being ‘normal’. Ever seen a normal politician?
Ed Miliband is as close to normal as we can hope for. The media hacks should work at finding people jobs in the classsifieds’ columns — I shall miss Paxo and Snow[Snr] can’t go on much lomger.
Hopi at least speaks his mind – whoops, he is on the shortlist of truth-seekers who are for the push then? Pity.
But then again, the Truth was ale-ways hard to handle when in-the-cups, and certainly not with a belly-full of Stolichnaya – ask any drunken Russian.
(Sorry, Vlad, but may I ask why Siberia, Australia, NZ and Canada don’t play football in Brazil? Any comments would be very helpful -rsvp- Moscow-on-Thames offices RT)
Why did [we] forget God?
Mainly because our next PM and the current deputy PM are atheists.
Hopi Sen makes good convolutes sense: to himself.
God [wtmb] asks for nowt in return as sHe is not vain.
Knock God as you wish, but on your death-bed, try ot to ask for His/Her help?
Too many good folk believe consistently in God to make me even wonder why I read your diatribe and that of Dawkins.
Try asking 100% of the electorate in their ‘heart-of-hearts’ what they really think of God?
And then re-write this piece.
At least you are thinking with your brains and not your …. elbow.
Politics matters to them as need the Politicians.
We, the people, may be a futile woking mass to tories but we, the people, expect truth to be sought after. I am impressed with you Hopi for being a searcher and well educated researcher — try now to prove the theory with, say, our next bank-rollers: the Chinese?
The truth of the matter is we don’t think much of the UK political class as they are out of touch.
Scary stuff.