Thank you for very much for that warm welcome. I really appreciate it.
Can I echo what John Woodcock said about giving a big thank you. It wasn’t for want of a better ground campaign that we lost this election.
You worked your socks off and gave your heart and soul.
There’s been a lot of talk about what last week’s result was like.
Some people have said it felt a lot like 1992.
But it wasn’t – it was worse than that.
In 1992, we were making progress, gaining seats.
At this election, we lost seats, falling even further behind than we were in 2010.
We go into the next election, defending scores of seats with wafer thin majorities, and needing to win 94 seats to secure a majority of just 2.
That is an enormous challenge – and we will only overcome it if we understand why we lost, and how we win again.
There’s a lot of learning still to be done.
But the election taught us a few things, if ever we needed reminding of them.
First, and most crucially, if we don’t win the argument on the economy, then voters will not believe we can implement our promises – however appealing they may be.
Second, we cannot win just by loving the NHS – however much we do.
And, third, if we are going to help the people that most need a Labour Government, if we’re going to abolish the bedroom tax or increase the minimum wage, we need the support and wealth that’s created by others – the consent of those whose taxes pay for policies we seek to implement.
So, where do we go now?
Should we be the party of Middle England, the party of economic competence that rewards aspiration?
Should we try to reclaim our lost dominance in Scotland by being the party of the NHS, public services and redistribution?
Or should we concentrate on UKIP and chase disaffected working class voters, who found us unconvincing on immigration and welfare?
If only life was that simple.
As the results in Scotland, the rise of UKIP in the North, and our poor performance even among natural Labour voters in the South shows, not only are we not appealing to swing voters, in many places we’re not even appealing to our core voters.
We are going to have to attract new support from every corner of the country if we are to get back into government.
The challenge is not just about the centre ground, it’s about the ground to the south, to the north.
To rebuild that coalition we have to better understand what life is like for people living in our small towns, seaside resorts and suburbs, outside of our big cities.
We have to show that wanting to get on in life, to work hard, to make something of yourself, and to hope for a better future for your family, those are things we believe in, things that have always been an essential part of Labour’s reason for being and always will be.
Aspiration is not the preserve of the middle classes. I want it for the working classes.
I want a Britain where hard work pays, responsibility is rewarded, everyone plays by the same rules and shares in the rewards.
We need a leadership team with the confidence to face the awkward questions, have the debate that’s needed and take our argument on to TV, into the Commons chambers and to every corner of the country.
A team with the will to win.
I like winning elections!
There’s no prizes for second place and we can do nothing in opposition to help people and help this country.
So I’m in – and today I’m pleased to announce my candidacy for Deputy Leader of the Labour Party.
Thank you.
———————————
Caroline Flint MP is shadow secretary of state for energy and climate change. She tweets @CarolineFlintMP
What a condescending title for an article. When middle class politicians tell you what they want for the ‘working classes’ voters look else where.
Richard, I agree.
Politicians seem to forget they are MPs too – who should understand the failings, challenges and aspirations of local people.
It is insulting when those we pay to do a job (without a job description that is tested for annual ‘problem solving’ achievements) are making lame statements that only highlight how ‘out of touch’ they really are.
Labour leadership have to make clear whether they are simply working for ‘working people’ (those in work) or are they also ambitious in policy to support those who are proactive job-seekers – failed by an appalling Work Programme amid weak local employment services – who are aspirational amid the challenges they face.
This landmark of appalling electoral language that ALL parties adopted by saying “working for working people… who do the right thing”, added the weakness of Labour. How could a Labour party adopt such an appalling language when in principle they should also be standing strong by challenged groups who seek goals, and vulnerable groups who seek care?
How on earth could Labour lose the plot when MPs are suppose to be in touch with local people, groups and aspirations?
The more I look at this website the more convinced I am that it is working against the best interests of the Labour Party. Take this article as an example. The title as I have pointed out is condescending and the hectoring image of Caroline Flint looks as if it has been selected by a Sun editor.
I don’t know who is responsible for publishing articles on Progress but believe me when people see the name Jacqui Smith they think of only one thing, toe curling expenses claims. And yet she gets an article in every week. Strange?
Is it just crass incompetence with the editor of Progress or is there something more sinister going on?