400 days ago, Barack Obama celebrated his marginal Super Tuesday victory by proclaiming “we are the ones we’ve been waiting for.” To some, it was a grotesque exercise in hubris. But as it turned out, it was the rallying call to a new generation of activists craving to reclaim a stake in their own lives through a meaningful campaign that was ultimately their own.
In another 400 days, Labour will return to the electorate, seeking a fourth mandate that will allow the party to govern on the progressive values that really matter in modern Britain: not just tolerance of all, but genuine inclusion; not just political transparency but real openness and interaction; not just interdependence but a full rejection of the Tory mantra that you’re on your own.
After 12 years in office, Labour remains the party of ideas and ideals. In the first post-recessionary election, the voices for a centre-left future are as loud as they’ve ever been and our commitment to change and social democratic solutions to the challenges we face is real. Labour’s progressive values are 21st century values: welfare support in times of hardship; a just spread of the rewards of our national economy; a fully fit and fully funded national health service; rights and responsibilities in our communities and our economy alike; and the educational fairness that leads to increased opportunity and social mobility.
But at the most tangible level, in our local communities and at constituency meetings, our diligence and desire for a permanent process of renewal have been diminished by our habitual acquiescence to a clique of implicitly trusted yae-sayers.
In these localities where Labour policies truly find delivery, our organisation can be a barrier to participation rather than a gateway to it. Experience or incumbency count over innovation. Loyalty to the individual is more important than loyalty to the group’s aims. Votes are familiar-faced formalities. Orthodoxies go largely unchallenged except for the pedants screaming to impose arcane and archaic party rules.
The result is that new voices are crowded out by the same hands that built a commanding but controlling party structure in the 1990s. Members and delegates leave meetings feeling more frustrated than empowered and our movement for constant progress can feel stagnant even to those directly involved.
Frankly, it’s a problem symptomatic in our entire participatory process. Technological advances such as Facebook and Twitter are used as commodities for hammering home a message, rather than as a sincere means to open up. Ministers would never hold a press conference and then stand fingers-in-ears while questions were asked, but on LabourList they refuse to respond to comments or engage in anything like a two-way relationship. And councillors aren’t reaching out to supporters and constituents nearly enough, either online or on the doorsteps.
In the next 15 months, this sluggishness will lead only to failure in the face of a relentless Conservatism, unless there is a real shift in the procedural ethos of our people on the ground. It won’t take anything so radical as a Cultural Glasnost – but it will require a bottom-up spring clean and a recognition that the tried and trusted personnel cannot always bring about the Change We Need.
Labour hasn’t run out of talent – on the contrary, our movement contains within it the seeds of its own regeneration. There are many brilliant and passionate people and many fresh voices pushing the party forward toward our common aim.
But if we are to end the anachronistic torpor at the heart of our movement, we must take a risk on renewal at our grassroots. That means being bold enough to make a candid reassessment of the quality of our people’s organisational skills, and changing them where required. It means reengaging young people in our CLPs by allowing them a greater stake in their constituencies and a bigger say in how they’re run.
And we need to start now, because there are only 400 days left to reconnect.
I suspect you might wake up in 400 days and think well thats it, Labour will need to start again and try to get elected in say twenty or thirty years time, eighteen years under Thatcher twelve under a government run on Thatcherite ideals, god I’ve had enough.
Alex Smith’s article is spot on the button. Here in Birmingham we are being suffocated by a hugely cumbersome, lumbering, bureaucratic, top-down Party structure run by Regional Office – each of the 10 CLPs is instructed to follow an identikit model of Byzantine complexity with so many officers per ward, per gender, per CLP, with local candidates on the same prescriptive model of x men, y women, this year and that year etc. the only criterion that is missing in the formula, is whether the person is any good at – or has the least interest in – campaigning!!
Many of us – longstanding members and new recruits – are abandoning engagement with this ossified structure and setting up volunteer campaign networks, and shared campaigning events, getting active on the ground and making an impact. There is no lack of energy or enthusiasm within our Birmingham membership – but the ‘official structure’ is dominated by a bureaucracy totally unable to mobilise activity and unleash the latent energy that is undoubtedly there.
Time for a root and branch overhaul of the old style rule book structure. As Alex says, this is the worst exceses of the past, stifling the life out of the next generation.
Rob Pocock, PPC Sutton Coldfield
I used to be very involved with the local machinary of the Labour party (Chair of CLP etc) but haven’t been to a meeting since 2000.
However, it doesn’t stop me campaigning as often as possible either locally in Hackney or more widely across the UK. The structures are dull and anachronistic but it’s not as though there’s a great raft or people who would be “active” in the Labour party if only the meetings were less dull.
The structures channel the energies of those who are interested in them. Those that aren’t can just get out and campaign. There are bigger issues facing the Labour party than amends to the rule book.
Fantastic article and I completely agree. I’m lucky in that in my CLP (Manchester Central) and the city at large, youth involvement is encouraged and as I just got elected Youth Officer for City Party, I fully intend to ensure young members are involved, engaged and supported to progress. Unfortunately it isn’t the same everywhere and we need root and branch reform to the existing structure to make it more open and accessible. The talent, energy and enthusiasm is there, it just needs to be allowed to flourish.