(This article was first published on Comment is Free on 30th May 2009)
There is a radical wave of political energy across all parties and amongst the voters – a wave that is demanding that from this political disaster there emerges a new way of doing politics in this country. The question now is not if there should be constitutional reform but what reforms and how will they be decided on.
Historically the mechanism for deciding on the great questions of constitutional change have been constitutional conventions. This option has been discussed in cabinet. There is a great deal of support for it. We do not need another long study of the options. We know what the options on the major issues are. The task now is to decide between these options and to put that choice to the country either in a referendum or through a general election. A constitutional convention need not take years to come to a recommendation – it could do it in six months. The rotten parliament now sitting could introduce the legislation for which there was consensus and a new parliament could introduce other measures on which the major parties did not agree. This would show that politicians have not only “got it” but that they know they have had to do something about it. This would not be business as usual. It would be a fresh start.
But it may be that we are past this now. Unlock Democracy will argue on Monday that rather than politicians sorting out the mess that politicians have made, the people should be called in. The citizens’ convention, randomly chosen people, discussing the options, agreeing on the issues and binding Parliament to carry out their wishes is the mechanism we need to sort out this mess. Grassroots democracy to sweep away the old politics and bring in the new – a new voting system, a new way of running the house of commons, a new relationship between voter and MP which pushes in the direction of delegate and away from the notion of representative. This seems to be the key to what people want. They want some sort of control over their MPs, they want a transparency in the way they work, they want to see the job of scrutiny done better and there seems to be a genuine desire to see the legislature more powerful in relation to the executive.
Both mechanisms for reform have arguments in their favour. Progress, a Labour party pressure group and other organisations are lining up behind the citizens’ convention, and powerful figures in government are discussing the old style constitutional convention. Ministers have called for a change to the voting system. David Cameron has called for profound constitutional change. What matters most is that the reform that takes place is built on a consensus between the parties. That means an initially long list of constitutional changes – voting system, elected second chamber, recall of corrupt MPs, reform of Commons procedures, term limits and fixed-term parliaments, a written constitution and a constitutional court and so on – will gradually be reduced to those reforms that can be agreed on. This is where the old politics will re-enter the scene. The Conservatives are so far ahead in the polls why would they accept a change to the voting system? The Liberal Democrats and Labour might be seen as cynical if they do a deal on this now. A written constitution would involve reducing the flexibility of Parliament and MPs will be reluctant to allow this. Similarly, the executive will be reluctant to allow more power to the legislature and what prime minister would want to give up their ability to call an election at the time of their choosing? And there are other many other complex issues. The great thing is: the country is debating them.
It has been a dark and bloody few weeks in politics but what is emerging could be the beginning of a renewal of our democracy. We are living at a defining moment and one that is rather wonderful. Suddenly all the parties are in favour of reform. Many of these issues have long been the preserve of political anoraks, now they are the stuff of water-cooler chat and saloon bar argument. From the stench of the lowest political moment of my lifetime, I can feel a huge opportunity arising to engage people in their civic life and keep them engaged in the political process. The expenses scandal showed a free press at its best, the political class at its worst. The freedom of information legislation that ignited the fuse under this scandal has proved its worth. Our democracy has been fundamentally weakened by what has happened but it could be greatly strengthened by how we respond now. There is a unique opportunity here. The people are coming, and they want to take charge.
Brian Brivati is a signatory to Progress’s “Real Reform Now!” campaign calling for a Citizens’ Convention
It’s nice to see a website that’s trying to bring about democratic change, I’d love to be able to help in this process some how so here’s my suggestion.
Every elected representative should be obliged by law to record a video clip after every parliament vote which states what they voted AND their reasons for doing it. If they didn’t vote they should also have to record a clip stating as such and again giving their reasons. I think the effect of this could be big, it would mean that politicians would know that their decision would be forever recorded and available for the press, NGOs, future historians and most importantly their constituents. Of course it is already recorded but a mark indicating in favour or not in favour has less impact then a video showing them giving their justification. Imagine now if we could go onto youtube and pull up every video of a politician who voted for the Iraq war and replay it again and again listening to their reasons. I think it would make politicians more likely to vote how they believe and less easy to be strong armed by the whips. That all said thou isn’t the justification for the idea, it’s simply a matter of democracy and making it easier for the public to see what their representatives are doing and why. All politicians should embrace this idea as it would give them a platform to address their constituents. Any who opposed the idea would obviously only do so if they didn’t think people would respect their decisions and rational. This should be hosted by the parliament servers and also have all the members’ addresses to parliament recorded with it to offer a complete profile of our representatives for any to view.
Brian I agree with what you say, as I do with Alan’s idea. However, I have been labeled as naïve elsewhere on this site (I am flattered, usually I am called other things) to want the role of whips questioned and how they might influence MPs votes; so it will be an uphill battle. Interestingly, when we question such things we are told what happened in the past and somehow these modern MPs are more rebellious against party lines. Well for the good of our country and my grandchildren I want to be thinking about the future! For example, there has been talk about changing the first past the post voting; well even that is being questioned as it may undermine the government. Well you cannot talk about a truly representative system if you dismiss this idea without proper free and open debate. If we still want a winner takes all system, then MPs cannot truly represent all their constituents because logic tells us that they will say we won; your vote lost; perhaps that is why they did not vote against introducing student fees along with many other things. Unless there is a better way soon, we will always have this “we won and I” attitude.
Yes Brian, but the response must be in a mature way, psychologically, the MPs must now take stock, we all have to adapt to change, some quicker than others. Yes, it affects us all psychologically, but to want the same old way, is to be in denial; if you really want to use your education, knowledge and skills, are open to change and want to be in the twenty first century; grasp the opportunity to make it real.
Gordon Brown said yesterday that eh wants change; get on with it. Remember though, there are those besides MPs you will have to change in the system; remind them that they too are public servants and not there for their own power games and gratification.
Gordon also said that he wants to change the NHS, the BBC, etc, well you will be fighting those bedsides MPs; it will be an uphill struggle with much wailing and weeping!
Florence Nightingale said “I think one’s feelings waste themselves in words, they all ought to be distilled into actions which bring results”
Gordon, David, Nick and everyone else: Get on with it!